If you look at relatively close other product then the Mediatek Kompanio 820/824 is a good ballpark which is sort of considered mid level chromebook or basic entry level desktop.
You could do like firefly and have your ITX motherboard RK3588 but for $450 you would have to be very casual about spending to pay that for what is still a RK3588.
I think some other manufactures have also similar ITX offerings and prices seem to be $250 to firefly’s confusing price as with $450 there is a hell of a lot you can buy for that.
I think Radxa have the format of the Rock5 as near perfect you can get it and have amazingly competitive price tag, but its still a mid level chromebook style processor and anything from the Rock5B isn’t gaining anything but cost.
Rockchip have announced a lower cost RK3588s will be available and the loss of the PCIe x4 for the likes of a eMMC budget desktop is not that big a deal especially if its cheaper.
The PCIe x4 on the RK3588 for NAS is sort of pointless as its hugely bottlenecked by the network available whilst Rockchip just released some perfect NAS style Socs with the Rk3566/68.
I will never understand why the RK3568 was released without a single USB3.0 OTG, 2.5Gbe & 1x sata so that with a x5 port gives great options of 6x sata on a budget board that isn’t that stupid pi format needing a riser.
Or even a RK3566 with x3 sata and the normal 1gbe as a super low cost ready to go NAS.
The RK3566/68 where incredibly unique SoCs primed for router / NaS roles and still scratching my head to the formats released and would find a SoC that is primed for entry desktops/set-tops being used as a router/NAS as equally as strange.
The RK3566/68 have that cut down mp1 Mali-G52 EE as I don’t think rockchip had any intentions for a desktop role apart from video modes.