That’s just one of the many examples where some bootloader ‘fixes’ at Armbian resulted in bricked boards, isn’t it? I mean you reference https://github.com/armbian/build/pull/2501 which just deals with a ‘fix’ that got lost somewhere inside Armbian’s build system and needed to be applied again?
This discussion here was about ‘how does RK3588 get better/mainline Linux support?’, right? I don’t see that such Armbian internals add anything to this (same with the other links you slapped into this forum) but of course I might be wrong and people considering themselves being part of the Armbian crowd will work on RK3588 once available…
That’s a question many ask in the meantime. Especially since you do this as excessive and again* and again. Most probably to generate some cash? But honestly that’s a question only you can answer.
BTW: by looking at https://forum.armbian.com/forum/22-board-bring-up/ I can’t find RockPi 4 at all. What’s the reason for this? No discussion ever happened? Armbian owner simply decided to do whatever strikes his head as usual?
Do you remember why this subforum exists? To limit the count of boards ‘we’ (me and Mikhail included back then) want to support.
Isn’t it funny that one guy all the time felt not bound to consensus of ‘the project’ while now the same guy is whining everywhere that he needs cash otherwise count of supported boards will be drastically limited?
* only morons believe censoring would work: https://archive.md/https://forum.armbian.com/topic/17148-random-rant/