https://github.com/kwankiu/acu/tree/pkgbuilds/linux-aarch64-rockchip-bsp6.1-joshua-panthor-git
Self build without gitweb-dlagent
https://github.com/kwankiu/acu/tree/pkgbuilds/linux-aarch64-rockchip-bsp6.1-joshua-panthor-git
Self build without gitweb-dlagent
is there any benchmarks between the panthor kerne and panfrost driver
and the joshua kernel and panfork driver ? what is the advantage of the panthor kernel?
Uli
One at least.
We have some Benchmarks posted on #panfrost of Radxaās discord.
Well, performanceā¦ according to glmark2 scores, I would say it is pretty much same as Panfork on 6.1
But Panfork have the ability to use gofaster and blob to get much better performance than default.
The advantage of using Panthor is that it is merged to mainline Mesa which means it will be more reliable and up-to-date in the future. And with panthor, we donāt need to rely on the mali_csffw blob driver from rockchip.
No need for any blobs at all?
But at least Mali firmware is on mainline not a separated rockchip version isnāt it?
I think RK does not have the authority and ability to modify the firmware source code, which is compiled and provided by upstream Arm.
Ah I see
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Arm-Mali-Panthor-Firmware-Git
I see it is part of linux-firmware:
kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git - Repository of firmware blobs for use with the Linux kernel
yeah use the firmware in mainline, it is also in correct path and known to be working, if you like adventure you can try replacing it
Hi, @boogiepop. Hi, everyone. Iām wondering if thereās a way to get the new agr
packages to build using all 8 of the rock5bās cores? At the moment packages like the kernel which take a long time already are only being built using a single core.
Yeah sure just add -j8 to MAKEFLAGS in
makepkg.conf
Additionally @kwankiu created a binary repo for such experimental packages:
https://github.com/kwankiu/archlinux-installer-rock5/releases/tag/b07-dev
Installer Image for new install:
Great. Is there a way that I can make configuration changes to the packages, such as to the radxa kernel? It seems that my fan has stopped working after changing to the new agr
one.
Has it really stopped working or switched to a different curve? The collabora curve is quite tolerant of high temps (and not well thought through).
You can, but you need to clone the pkgbuild and build yourself.
In radxa kernel i gave an option to use the config under custom/config.
Not sure about other kernels i dont maintain them. But you can modify them however you want.
It seems to have stopped working. I had been using fanctrl-rock5b to control the fan on my board. The program panics now. Iād also tried following the old radxa wiki instructions on how to start the fan from the shell and I get this error message from the first command:
echo: write error: device or resource busy
Iām thinking that at some point, the way that the fan is supposed to be accessed was changed. The procedure is different in the new radxa wiki. So, I guess I could modify fanctrl-rock5b
, and get it to work again. Also Iāve noticed that I canāt change the way that the blue led flashes anymore as well.
In most newer kernels (5.10.160+), the fan is controlled via a kernel driver, not a userspace script.
Which kernel driver?